Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:13:32 -0500
From:      "Mike." <>
Subject:   Re: gmirror, gpart and MBR vs GPT in the Handbook
Message-ID:  <201312021213320528.00673D5F@smtp.24cl.home>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <201311301303210813.05DE187E@smtp.24cl.home> <> <201312011121580096.005D00FB@smtp.24cl.home> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 12/1/2013 at 10:21 AM Warren Block wrote:

|On Sun, 1 Dec 2013, Mike. wrote:
|> On 11/30/2013 at 2:17 PM Warren Block wrote:
|> A question about the wording of that paragraph.  The second
|> sentence states:
|> "Because GPT partition schemes also store metadata at the end
|> the disk, mirroring full GPT disks with gmirror(8) is not
|> recommended."
|> The word "full" is ambiguous.  Is it to mean, "full" as in
|> of data', or "full" as in 'the entire disk'?
|It means mirroring an entire disk, including boot blocks and
|rather than just parts of it like partitions or filesystems.
|I'll work on rewriting that paragraph for clarity.

I noticed a change in the wording this morning.  :)

My understanding is that MBR can be used with drives only up to
and including 2TB in size.  So if I use MBR, the maximum drive
size I could use would be 2TB.  Is that correct?

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>