Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:15:27 -0400 From: "Scott Ullrich" <sullrich@gmail.com> To: "Norberto Meijome" <freebsd@meijome.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, mgrooms@shrew.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD NAT-T patch integration Message-ID: <d5992baf0806250815q5d76187yd1b3c7d4cc79217d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080625135437.32e7a1f9@ayiin> References: <0efb44e3c6c6603e69207eb15fec2718@localhost> <20080625135437.32e7a1f9@ayiin>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:01:46 -0500 > mgrooms <mgrooms@shrew.net> wrote: > >> Is anyone currently looking at the IPsec NAT-T patches? I posted a similar >> question several months ago around the FAST_IPSEC + IPv6 integration time >> frame. Maybe now that things have settled a bit, this work can be reviewed >> and possibly committed? > > +1 Both m0n0wall and pfSense also use NAT-T. It sure would be nice to have it in FreeBSD so we can discontinue our patching every time we move to a newer FreeBSD revision. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d5992baf0806250815q5d76187yd1b3c7d4cc79217d>