Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 12:00:15 +0100 From: Orion Hodson <O.Hodson@cs.ucl.ac.uk> To: Peter Parnes <peppar@cdt.luth.se> Cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: good or bad idea ? (vat-related...) Message-ID: <613.918993615@cs.ucl.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 14 Feb 1999 11:09:40 %2B0100." <199902141009.LAA13972@basil.cdt.luth.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<199902141009.LAA13972@basil.cdt.luth.se>Peter Parnes writes: > > luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it said: > > I am not 100% sure that passing URL's in RTCP fields is totally out of > > scope (will check). > > No it is not. There is a type called application specific data that > could be used for transmitting the current URL but remember that > there are people using other types of tools for MBone-audio > conferencing than vat and rat. Yes, you can use the APP field, but this is really 'other' application data rather than application data. Anyway, it's still better on a separate stream... - o To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?613.918993615>