Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:16:47 +0100 From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> To: Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Telting <christopher-ml@telting.org>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Established method to enable suid scripts? Message-ID: <BANLkTim69aoAAr39UKWGMQTbzZz7xmbPEA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86k4duh4q9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4DC9DE2C.6070605@telting.org> <201105121657.57647.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <4DCBFC39.8060900@telting.org> <201105130932.32144.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <BANLkTin4rkQouSiOy4M1uu%2BqXSWJzF_STA@mail.gmail.com> <4DCD02EF.7050808@telting.org> <86k4duh4q9.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
C On Friday, 13 May 2011, Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com> wrote: > Chris Telting <christopher-ml@telting.org> writes: > >> On 05/13/2011 01:32, krad wrote: >>> what i cant understand is the complete aversion to sudo. Could you >>> shed any light on why you are trying to avoid a tried and tested >>> method. >> >> That I freely admit is for no rational reason. It's just annoying. But > > ...a shebang can be written with sudo in mind, e.g. > > =A0#! /usr/bin/env -S sudo sh > =A0id > > =A0$ ./foo.sh > =A0uid=3D0(root) gid=3D0(wheel) groups=3D0(wheel),5(operator) > =A0$ ls -l > =A0-rwxr-xr-x =A01 luser luser 31 May 13 21:36 foo.sh > >> let me ask you.. is "sudo ping" acceptable? Please explain the logical >> reason why not. It would be the preferred method if suid didn't exist >> and sudo was part of the base system. > I'm still bemused to why unless it just an academic exercise
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTim69aoAAr39UKWGMQTbzZz7xmbPEA>