Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 08:46:31 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/dos for doscmd Message-ID: <19970810084631.HZ57983@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <lw67tees0n.fsf@terror.hungry.com>; from Faried Nawaz on Aug 9, 1997 18:38:48 -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970810001113.22220A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> <199708092050.PAA04951@dyson.iquest.net> <lw67tees0n.fsf@terror.hungry.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Faried Nawaz wrote: > Hmmm... You are right... What is a good "semi-standard" place to > put such things. I don't necessarily think that we should create > another directory, or should we? > What does it try to install? How about somewhere in /usr/libdata? I also thought about /usr/libdata (or /usr/libexec -- it seems to be an executable file, although not a Unix executable). The Makefile would currently break `make release', btw., since it relies on X11 being installed. This should probably be made automatically dependant on the actual configuration. Negative side effect: the doscmd that ships with releases won't be able to do X11. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970810084631.HZ57983>