Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 May 2019 16:56:59 -0400
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        KOT MATPOCKuH <matpockuh@gmail.com>, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: route based ipsec
Message-ID:  <ce7efd06-f86d-b95d-08c1-0b31e58d2e3c@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <CALmdT0Wdb%2B=LHvTaO9MU=MnQvQJEzKT9CXAf2kVPY=AAc=kxVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CALmdT0Wdb%2B=LHvTaO9MU=MnQvQJEzKT9CXAf2kVPY=AAc=kxVQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/2/2019 4:16 PM, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> 0.The ipsec-tools port currently does not have a maintainer (C) portmaster
> ... Does this solution really supported? Or I should switch to use another
> IKE daemon?


Take a look at StrongSwan in the ports for your IKE daemon and google
around for config examples / discussions. The bad news-- The ipsec docs
really need updating. The good news, StrongSwan and IPSEC in RELENG_11
and 12 are really great and well maintained.  Documentation is sadly not
in one place.


    ---Mike


-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 x203
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ce7efd06-f86d-b95d-08c1-0b31e58d2e3c>