Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:04:36 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Christian Fortin <cfortin@ec.camitel.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, sales@cyclades.com Subject: RE: sync card? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970911085737.818a@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.970910182134.cfortin@ec.camitel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Christian Fortin wrote: > We use Cyclades 16y, The Cyclades is ASYNCHRONOUS, not SYNCHRONOUS. > and the driver is not for eveay duty ISP. > It work fine for terminal, but it's was not full proof for work with TUN. > I try to have some kind of support, but the driver is not made by Cyclades > And they dont take the responsability to support it. > The companie have a full support for Linux but not for FreeBSD. Sadly, it is true that Cyclades supports Linux but not FreeBSD, but I found there was plenty of support from FreeBSD-isp, FreeBSD-hackers. > We plan to buy some others boards, If you have some experience with your > driver/supplyer/PPP Well, you can also try the Stallion boards, but before you ditch Cyclades note well that the Linux drivers for Cyclades are add-ons supplied by Cyclades; the FreeBSD driver is ***integrated into the FreeBSD kernel***. This is why you need to ask FreeBSD people about the driver, not Cyclades Inc. I have found the Cyclades cards to work well, without much fuss, except for some CLOCAL problems. What problems did you experience? Danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970911085737.818a>