Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:48:37 -0700 From: Alex Zepeda <zipzippy@sonic.net> To: Don Lewis <dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org>, current@freebsd.blarf.homeip.net, org@blarf.homeip.net, dnelson@allantgroup.com Subject: Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)? Message-ID: <20020711034837.GA4466@blarf.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <200207102034.g6AKYowr008392@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <20020710172619.GB86282@dan.emsphone.com> <200207102034.g6AKYowr008392@gw.catspoiler.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:34:50PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "inp" locked from ../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:935 > > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "tcp" locked from ../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:928 > > I've never seen that one. I'll take a look at the code, though. I'm seeing the same (once at bootup tho). sm:blarf:~$uptime 8:48PM up 18:52, 4 users, load averages: 0.11, 0.06, 0.01 sm:blarf:~$ Sweet. Oddly the SMP kernels seem a tad more stable. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020711034837.GA4466>