Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:43:10 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: gerald@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Why not use normal CONFLICTS in lang/gcc43 instead of custom? Message-ID: <op.uvgzawdm9aq2h7@localhost>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Gerald, I am trying to install x11/gnome2 last night and the build has gotten stop at lang/gcc43, because of conflict with lang/gcc295. But wait, I don't have lang/gcc295 install. I only have ccache installed that has put 'gcc295' in /usr/local/libexec/ccache/ and this path is in the front of my PATH. It caused lang/gcc43 to find it by mistake. ----------------------------------- # ls -l /usr/local/libexec/ccache/ | grep 295 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 June 12 14:36 g++295@ -> /usr/local/bin/ccache lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 June 12 14:36 gcc295@ -> /usr/local/bin/ccache # echo $PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- pre-extract: @# Building libgcj with lang/gcc295 installed is causing a failure @# about "hidden symbol `__eprintf'" in libgcc.a(_eprintf.o). @if type gcc295 >/dev/null ; then \ echo "This port will not build in the presence of lang/gcc295."; \ exit 1; \ fi ----------------------------------- Puzzled me for you to not use the CONFLICTS, so why not use it? If you really can't use CONFLICTS, then can you use the full path of gcc295? Thanks. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.uvgzawdm9aq2h7>