Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 15:32:21 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: S?ren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> Cc: julian@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ps keyword.c src/lib/libc/i386/sys sigsuspend.S src/sys/i386/linux linux.h linux_dummy.c linux_m Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.981219153025.7318A-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199812191628.RAA07787@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I do test before.. I also test the committed product. i.e. I re-check out the tree from freefall directly and build it from there as well. This catches such things as errors from patch(1) or cvs fuckups this is what I was refering to testing. On Sat, 19 Dec 1998, S?ren Schmidt wrote: > > > This code is dependent on the conditional > > > COMPAT_LINUX_THREADS (suggested by Garret) > > > This is not yet a 'real' option but will be within some number of hours. > > Part of my test is to do a "Make world" and make LINT on sources freshly > > checked out > > to ensure I didn;t break normal operations. > > > > this is taking longer than expected today so I have still not confirmed > > I haven't broken anything here.. > > (But I'm still checking.. If I have, I'll fix it as soon as I discover > > it..) > > Excuse me, but I thought the "prime directive" was to test such things > BEFORE they where committed?? > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Søren Schmidt (sos@freebsd.org) FreeBSD Core Team member > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.981219153025.7318A-100000>