Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:53:37 -0400 From: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> To: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net> Cc: "Gary W. Swearingen" <swear@blarg.net>, Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 127/8 continued Message-ID: <20010928235337.A94406@tp.databus.com> In-Reply-To: <200109290320.WAA37596@aurora.sol.net>; from jgreco@ns.sol.net on Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:20:42PM -0500 References: <tnhetnj8a9.etn@localhost.localdomain> <200109290320.WAA37596@aurora.sol.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I agree completely that the manpages are not and should not be a substitute for a good networking book. Part of the conceptual problem is that Ethernet has evolved far from its coax origin, when it really was a broadcast medium. As soon as twisted-pair was born, Ethernet became *electrically* point-to-point, but continues to be logically broadcast. With fancy GBICs these days running GigE over dark fiber up to 70 km, Ethernet makes an awfully nice point-to-point technology. Despite all that, I've never seen a fixed point-to-point circuit that was not a /30 if it landed on its own interface at the ISP's router. The exceptions are all multiplexed/channeled at the ISP. I'm not sure RFC3021 is out there in the real Internet yet. Has anyone seen a T1 or better provisioned as a /31? Barney On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:20:42PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote: > > My own feeling is that describing terms such as these are not really the > function of the BSD manual system; if you're working with networks, then > I would expect that there's a fundamental understanding that a T1 is a > point to point network and that an Ethernet is a multipoint network. A > good intro-to-networking text will clear that up for most people. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010928235337.A94406>