Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:55:27 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net> Cc: Kiril Mitev <kiril@ideaglobal.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stability and versions - was Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? Message-ID: <200003311655.JAA35705@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 21:47:05 %2B0100." <XFMail.000330214705.steveo@eircom.net> References: <XFMail.000330214705.steveo@eircom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <XFMail.000330214705.steveo@eircom.net> "Steve O'Hara-Smith" writes: : It may very well be the case that 2.2-stable is currently the most : stable FreeBSD around, the main reason for this is that for quite some : time now it has been getting _only_ bug and security fixes (IIRC only the : latter for some time). And only sometimes. there are lots of security nasties that haven't been and never will be fixed in 2.2.x. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003311655.JAA35705>