Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:24:35 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=) To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Process for requesting reverting patch? Message-ID: <86646wzfv0.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20070513183009.GA96018@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (Steve Kargl's message of "Sun\, 13 May 2007 11\:30\:09 -0700") References: <20070513175425.GA64710@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <864pmg1t1s.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070513183009.GA96018@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes: > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:23:43PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes: > > > What is the formal process to get a recent commit to -current > > > reverted? Do I send email to core? > > You start by talking to the person who did the commit. That much should > > be obvious. > I would expect a committer, who changes something as important as > the default shell in FreeBSD, to read the freebsd-current mailing > list and the PR database. I would expect a committer such as yourself to know that there are better ways to approach this than posting to -current and threatening to take the matter to core@. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86646wzfv0.fsf>