Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 23:06:44 +0200 From: Beat Siegenthaler <beat.siegenthaler@beatsnet.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple instances of BIND at startup Message-ID: <4835E064.70803@beatsnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20080522203932.GA74897@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <48345138.8080507@ibctech.ca> <4834599A.1090108@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4834A7B4.9030302@ibctech.ca> <20080521232319.GA57359@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4834B7EE.3000002@ibctech.ca> <20080522020619.GA69543@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4834D891.6050707@ibctech.ca> <20080522035913.GA78449@osiris.chen.org.nz> <483503AD.60801@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4835634F.6060107@ibctech.ca> <20080522203932.GA74897@osiris.chen.org.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathan Chen wrote: > > If this were true, the "view" feature would be broken. I've just tried > this with a client-based ACL, and there doesn't appear to any > cache-leaking across views. Any counter-examples would be welcome. > I did this tests too. No leaks found. ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.kransite.de. IN A Maybe this was a a bug in 4.x or 8x ? I cannot even find some hints about such a issue.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4835E064.70803>