Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:09:12 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de> Cc: Brian Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd builtins.c inetd.h Message-ID: <42091.932735352@axl.noc.iafrica.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 %2B0200." <19990723150602.B10047@internal>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-) > On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > What does "sucking all the CPU time" mean? Does it mean that other > > programs were suffering, or does it mean that it was the only > > significant user of CPU and so showed up at close to 100% CPU usage? I don't care how the usage is split over syslog and inetd. What I want to know is whether their combined usage of the CPU causes a serious problem for other CPU-bound processes. After all, you _have_ asked the inetd+syslog pair to do a lot of work. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42091.932735352>