Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 08:25:49 -0400 From: Wesley Shields <wxs@atarininja.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@freebsd.org>, Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/tclX Makefile Message-ID: <20070503122549.GE29108@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20070502221119.GA44953@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200705021957.l42JvwXm090850@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070502201548.GA43460@xor.obsecurity.org> <cb5206420705021440i4d28d165t72ce1c6ea766487@mail.gmail.com> <20070502215101.GA44575@xor.obsecurity.org> <cb5206420705021503o32a4804cv52c01f658eb84b68@mail.gmail.com> <20070502221119.GA44953@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:11:19PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:03:19AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 5/3/07, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > > >On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 01:40:52AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > >> On 5/3/07, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > > >> >On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:57:58PM +0000, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > >> >> mi 2007-05-02 19:57:58 UTC > > >> >> > > >> >> FreeBSD ports repository > > >> >> > > >> >> Modified files: > > >> >> lang/tclX Makefile > > >> >> Log: > > >> >> Work-around the deficiencies in FreeBSD package-building cluster, > > >> >> which causes the regression-tests to fail by disabling the > > >regression > > >> >> tests. > > >> >> > > >> >> Unbreak -- the build was never "broken" for the usual (non-jail) > > >> >> systems. > > >> > > > >> >Thanks. Just for the record, building in a jail is a supported > > >> >configuration for all users, so it's something that is required to > > >> >work for all ports. > > >> > > >> So can we please actually write it down somewhere? > > > > > >I am not sure of an appropriate place to record this fact. > > >Suggestions? > > > > Anywhere in the Porter's Handbook, naturally. I'll be > > updating docs this summer, you can probably leave it to > > me if you don't find this urgent. This thread will > > remain starred in my inbox until resolved. > > Yeah, what I mean is that there doesn't seem to be section as > currently written that this would be an appropriate addition to. Not quite the porters handbook but could it not fit in nicely under section 5.2.2 at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing-ports/maintain-port.html If it fits in nicely there I can come up with a patch to add it. -- WXS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070503122549.GE29108>