Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 21:00:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: "J.A. Terranson" <sysadmin@mfn.org> Cc: "'FreeBSD Questions'" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Old Machines Revisited (actual Question) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980505210013.9802L-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <01BD7857.B12AEC30@PresidentClintonsLawyer.UnitedStatesArmy.NET>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 May 1998, J.A. Terranson wrote: > Lets try this again: > > When this card *IS* set to respond (via hard JUMPER) to 0x280, it is NOT probed at that address. Period. There is NO other hardware at that address. I have managed a *temporary* work around > by allowing FBSD to see it at 0x300 (where it *insists* that this > card be!) while remapping another device to 0x280. Unfortunately, > this "fix" will only work on *one* box. I have 5 more that require > this card at the 0x280 address in order to accomodate wt0 at 0x300 > (since their Archive controller boards won't allow me to remap them: > the one board which *was* remapped had a Wangtek controller). okay, just double-checking. Can you try a different baseport? Most ethernet cards I know can range from 0x210 up to 0x330 or so. Perhaps this one machine is just a dodo. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980505210013.9802L-100000>