Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 20:32:39 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw command line - opinions wanted. Message-ID: <199702100332.UAA08115@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970210134608.427Y-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970210134608.427Y-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I was about to commit patches to ipfw.c to add a '-q' (quiet) option. > This will prevent the "Flushed all rules" message from appearing, but in > its present version still presents the question "Are you sure?" if the > '-f' flag is not present. > > Question: Should '-q' imply '-f' and prevent the "Are you sure?" prompt > on a flush? Yes.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702100332.UAA08115>