Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:33:23 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Drehmel <robert@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/svr4 svr4_sysvec.c Message-ID: <20020709173323.GA24994@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200207091459.g69ExRxg017714@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200207091459.g69ExRxg017714@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 07:59:27AM -0700, Robert Drehmel wrote: > robert 2002/07/09 07:59:27 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/compat/svr4 svr4_sysvec.c > Log: > The comment marked with XXX was right: emulate SVR4 for > ELF binaries branded with ELFOSABI_SYSV, this is reported > to work and brandelf(1) puts this type into files if "SVR4" > was specified. What was the report? Our SVR4 emulation was written around Solaris-x86. So using the Solaris branding is probably more proper. Note that ELFOSABI_SYSV is the same value as UN-branded. This has implications I'm not sure you thought about. Considering I'm the one that added the XXX comment: 1.11 (obrien 18-Apr-00): ELFOSABI_SOLARIS, /* XXX Or should we You might have wanted me to review this change. Also the SVR4 compat code will be used much more by our sparc64 platform than i386 one -- and there it will be used exclusively for Solaris binaries. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020709173323.GA24994>