Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:49:23 +0200 From: InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter <jg@internetx.com> To: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, JF-Bogaerts <JF-Bogaerts@skynet.be> Subject: Re: HAST with broken HDD Message-ID: <542BF853.3040604@internetx.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BdUSypO8xTR3sh_KSL9c9FLxbGH%2BbTR9-gPdcCVd%2Bt0UgUF-g@mail.gmail.com> References: <542BC135.1070906@Skynet.be> <542BDDB3.8080805@internetx.com> <CA%2BdUSypO8xTR3sh_KSL9c9FLxbGH%2BbTR9-gPdcCVd%2Bt0UgUF-g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 01.10.2014 um 14:28 schrieb George Kontostanos: > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:55 PM, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter > <jg@internetx.com <mailto:jg@internetx.com>> wrote: > > Am 01.10.2014 um 10:54 schrieb JF-Bogaerts: > > Hello, > > I'm preparing a HA NAS solution using HAST. > > I'm wondering what will happen if one of disks of the primary node will > > fail or become erratic. > > > > Thx, > > Jean-François Bogaerts > > nothing. if you are using zfs on top of hast zfs wont even take notice > about the disk failure. > > as long as the write operation was sucessfull on one of the 2 nodes, > hast doesnt notify the ontop layers about io errors. > > interesting concept, took me some time to deal with this. > > > Are you saying that the pool will appear to be optimal even with a bad > drive? > > https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?&t=24786
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?542BF853.3040604>