Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:18:37 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> To: Michael Reifenberger <mike@reifenberger.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST] netgraph callout interface Message-ID: <20041202161837.GB34136@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20041202165401.D21600@fw.reifenberger.com> References: <20041202151048.GA33485@cell.sick.ru> <20041202165401.D21600@fw.reifenberger.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:01:25PM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote: M> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: M> ... M> > http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/netgraph_callout M> > M> >It can be applied to HEAD or RELENG_5 (not 5.3-RELEASE). It patches M> >the following nodes: M> > M> M> I could test the following nodes on my gateway/firewall: M> bpf ether i4bing iface ppp pppoe socket vjc M> as I have both DSL and ISDN connects concurrently. M> M> but as it seems, i4bing (/sys/i4b/drivers/i4b_ing.c) is not M> currently adoptet and my use of FAST_IPSEC would invalidate the M> mpsavetiness... The patch does not enable mpsafeness. It just prepares many nodes to get ready to it. So, the patch should not change anything! The change is mechanical, but I have to test all of them before commiting. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041202161837.GB34136>