Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2014/freebsd-net/20141207.freebsd-net

Messages: 83, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:18:54 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Dec  6 rodrigc (Craig Rodrigues)  [Differential] [Closed] D1201: Allow UMA allocated memory to be freed when VNET jails are torn down.
  2. Dec  6 rodrigc (Craig Rodrigues)  [Differential] [Accepted] D1201: Allow UMA allocated memory to be freed when VNET jails are torn down.
  3. Dec  5 <knl@bitflop.com>          Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot (SOLVED - FOR REAL)
  4. Dec  5 <knl@bitflop.com>          Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot - another solution
  5. Dec  5 <knl@bitflop.com>          Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot (NOT SOLVED)
  6. Dec  5 Marjorie Murdock           Why your ears keep ringing (and what you can do about it)
  7. Dec  5 Yuriy Tabolin              Re: problem with 9k jumbo clusters
  8. Dec  5 David P. Discher           Re: FreeBSD 10-stable (r274577) LACP / IEEE 802.3ad with TP-Link TL-SG2008 - not working
  9. Dec  5 Chris H                    Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot (SOLVED)
 10. Dec  5 Chris H                    Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot (SOLVED)
 11. Dec  5 Xin Li                     Panic after iwn0 controller panic
 12. Dec  4 Warren Block               Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot (SOLVED)
 13. Dec  4 Adrian Chadd               Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot (SOLVED)
 14. Dec  4 Martin Hanson              Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot (SOLVED)
 15. Dec  4 Martin Hanson              Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot (SOLVED)
 16. Dec  4 Adam McDougall             Re: FreeBSD 10-stable (r274577) LACP / IEEE 802.3ad with TP-Link TL-SG2008 - not working
 17. Dec  4 Jack Vogel                 Re: problem with 9k jumbo clusters
 18. Dec  4 David P. Discher           Re: FreeBSD 10-stable (r274577) LACP / IEEE 802.3ad with TP-Link TL-SG2008 - not working
 19. Dec  4 Alan Somers                Re: FreeBSD 10-stable (r274577) LACP / IEEE 802.3ad with TP-Link TL-SG2008 - not working
 20. Dec  4 Martin Hanson              Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot


21. Dec 4 Alexander V. Chernikov Re: problem with 9k jumbo clusters 22. Dec 4 Robert Watson Re: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC 23. Dec 4 Ian Smith Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 24. Dec 4 Martin Hanson Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 25. Dec 4 Martin Hanson Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 26. Dec 4 Warren Block Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 27. Dec 4 Martin Hanson Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 28. Dec 3 Warren Block Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 29. Dec 3 Patrick Proniewski Re: Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK) 30. Dec 3 Martin Hanson Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 31. Dec 3 Martin Hanson Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 32. Dec 3 David P. Discher FreeBSD 10-stable (r274577) LACP / IEEE 802.3ad with TP-Link TL-SG2008 - not working 33. Dec 3 Patrick Proniewski Re: Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK) 34. Dec 3 Warren Block Re: NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 35. Dec 3 Steven Hartland Re: Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK) 36. Dec 3 Martin Hanson NICs devices switches "pshycial" place on each boot 37. Dec 3 Adrian Chadd Re: Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK) 38. Dec 3 Borja Marcos Re: Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK) 39. Dec 3 Patrick Proniewski Re: Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK) 40. Dec 3 Borja Marcos Re: Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK)
41. Dec 3 Patrick Proniewski Re: Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK) 42. Dec 3 Steven Hartland Re: Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK) 43. Dec 3 Patrick Proniewski Horrendous upload network performance with VLAN (download seems OK) 44. Dec 3 Marcelo Gondim Re: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 45. Dec 2 gnn (George Neville-Neil) [Differential] [Commented On] D1201: Allow UMA allocated memory to be freed when VNET jails are torn down. 46. Dec 2 rwatson (Robert Watson) [Differential] [Commented On] D1201: Allow UMA allocated memory to be freed when VNET jails are torn down. 47. Dec 2 rodrigc (Craig Rodrigues) [Differential] [Updated] D1201: Allow UMA allocated memory to be freed when VNET jails are torn down. 48. Dec 2 Julian Elischer Re: RFC: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC 49. Dec 2 Julien Charbon Re: TCP stack lock contention with short-lived connections 50. Dec 2 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: RFC: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC 51. Dec 2 Someone Somewhere Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 52. Dec 2 Yuri Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 53. Dec 2 George Neville-Neil Re: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC 54. Dec 2 Someone Somewhere Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 55. Dec 2 Julian Elischer Re: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC 56. Dec 2 George Neville-Neil Re: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC 57. Dec 2 Yuri Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 58. Dec 2 Marcelo Gondim Re: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 59. Dec 2 Mark Felder Re: How do I use net-mgmt/unifi{2,3,4} for Ubiquity UAP-PRO? 60. Dec 2 Adrian Chadd Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port?
61. Dec 1 Pieper, Jeffrey E RE: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 62. Dec 1 rpaulo (Rui Paulo) [Differential] [Abandoned] D1251: Test, please ignore. 63. Dec 1 rpaulo (Rui Paulo) [Differential] [Request, 2 lines] D1251: Test, please ignore. 64. Dec 1 Marcelo Gondim Re: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 65. Dec 1 Joe Holden Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 66. Dec 1 Adrian Chadd Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 67. Dec 1 Someone Somewhere Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 68. Dec 1 Karl Denninger Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 69. Dec 1 Yuri Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 70. Dec 1 Daniel Corbe Re: Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 71. Dec 1 Yuri Can multiple apps listen for TCP on the same port? 72. Dec 1 Marcelo Gondim Re: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 73. Dec 1 Marcelo Gondim Re: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 74. Dec 1 Marcelo Gondim Re: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 75. Nov 30 Sean Bruno pf(4) changes recently? 76. Nov 30 Jack Vogel Re: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 77. Nov 30 Adrian Chadd Re: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 78. Nov 30 David Wolfskill Re: How do I use net-mgmt/unifi{2,3,4} for Ubiquity UAP-PRO? 79. Nov 30 Alexander V. Chernikov Re: Problems with Intel X520-SR2 80. Nov 30 Marcelo Gondim Problems with Intel X520-SR2
81. Nov 30 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=F6rje_Jos Re: How do I use net-mgmt/unifi{2,3,4} for Ubiquity UAP-PRO? 82. Nov 30 Julian Elischer Re: RFC: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC 83. Nov 30 David Wolfskill How do I use net-mgmt/unifi{2,3,4} for Ubiquity UAP-PRO?


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date