Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 11:43:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> To: Leif Neland <leif@neland.dk> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mirrorred webservers: Updating, logging. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10103311241020.17936-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <01d501c0ba1f$23cc06a0$6405a8c0@neland.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Leif Neland wrote: > That still leaves that NFS-server as the single point of failure. So > that is no option. Not necessarily. People commonly use NetApp filers in this case. And clustering is a standard NetApp feature. Without clustering, NetApp claims 99.9% availability. With clustering, 99.99%. NetApp has a lot of integrity and availability checks. It is the only system I've seen that that does RAID scrubbing. > I discovered some smart guy had set our secondary nameserver to have > its files nfs-mounted from the primary. So much for redundancy... > > Leif Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10103311241020.17936-100000>