Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:55:22 -0800 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Jan Stocker <Jan.Stocker@t-online.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/44760: Tuxpuck update to 0.8.1 Message-ID: <20021031195522.GG197@vectors.cx> In-Reply-To: <1036093113.635.7.camel@twoflower> References: <200210310031.g9V0VFe0028188@freefall.freebsd.org> <1036093113.635.7.camel@twoflower>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> (10.31.2002 @ 1138 PST): Jan Stocker said, in 0.8K: << > What is the actual common practice for naming patch files in sub dirs? > After we've changed from the numbered patches to one-file-named-patches > we used :: as a separator. OO uses for the last few updates + as a > separator, so i thought the convention had been changed and i missed it. > So i used + and Adam changed it to :: ..... >> end of "Re: ports/44760: Tuxpuck update to 0.8.1" from Jan Stocker << Sorry about that. I had to regenerate the patch, and I used a different filename without thinking about it. You're most likely right, though. '+' probably is more correcter. - -Adam - -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx adamw@FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9wYqqo8KM2ULHQ/0RAiwaAKDOn07TNg6vAQ3X6WwO4SQM2VKpaQCeIPtc yN8zYcmlsgojoKBjgujPkXY= =DlBE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021031195522.GG197>