Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:37:12 -0800 From: "Brett D. Estrade" <estrabd@yahoo.com> To: "alan barrow" <alan.barrow@psineteurope.com>, "Eric Anderson" <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: freebsd-cluster <freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Clustering with FreeBSD Message-ID: <1076431032.2175.180806263@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1076429081.1351.53.camel@ip16.ops.uk.psi.com> References: <187a6c3bb6bd5002259b39e485140752@202.157.183.139> <4028CC66.80300@nentec.de> <1076425271.16867.180799810@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1076429081.1351.53.camel@ip16.ops.uk.psi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Check it out: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=dragonflybsd+virtual+eventually&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=000000%24c0e%40smth.org&rnum=2 "[22:21:16] <Questions> Floid asks: As an armchair usability nut, it's easy for me to see how increased modularity and decreased maintenance headaches should free users and developers to Get Real Work Done. However, not everyone "gets it," to the point of blank stares and "That's not a usability project." Mind taking a stab at why Slashdotters should (or shouldn't) think about DragonFly on the desktop in the next five years? [22:23:49] <dillon_> People migrate to operating systems for a vast array of reasons. I expect that our feature set will be the primary attractor. For example, the variant symlinks that will be going in in the next few weeks. There is also a lot of interest in a kernel-supported checkmark/restore function for general userland programs and some preliminary work on that has already done. My goal is to eventually have an SSI model that works across a network and a c [22:23:49] <dillon_> luster capability that can arbitrarily migrate processes between hosts (SSI == single system image, which means full cache coherency across a cluster). [22:24:12] <dillon_> It will depend heavily on what we are able to accomplish in the next year. " On 10 Feb 2004 16:04:40 +0000, "alan barrow" <alan.barrow@psineteurope.com> said: > really is.. is the question.. if so it's a dream come true. > > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 15:02, Eric Anderson wrote: > > Brett D. Estrade wrote: > > > What are the thoughts of DragonFlyBSD's goal of being able to create a > > > single virtual machine (1 cpu, presumably) out of many individual boxes? > > > > > > I didn't know that was a goal for dragonfly - but if it really is, I'm > > excited about that too.. is that vaporware, or has code writing begun > > for that? > > > > > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology > > Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- > ############################################### > yours Alan R. Barrow > > European OSS Development Manager. > Psinet Europe. > Brookmount Court > Kirkwood Road > UK-Cambridge CB4 2QH > > Tel: +44 1223 577 337 > Fax: +44 1223 577 600 > Mob: +44 7771 597 509 ===== http://www.brettsbsd.net/~estrabd __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1076431032.2175.180806263>