Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:02:39 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: (minor) issues after upgrading to 2.20 Message-ID: <1191801759.967.29.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <1191799076.53229.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <1191517967.61533.122.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> <47093C60.1060603@freebsd.org> <op.tzuk25j49aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <470958B1.3060605@freebsd.org> <op.tzul1jts9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1191798681.967.7.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> <1191799076.53229.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 19:17 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > My test system is an i386 -CURRENT machine that I just keep upgrading. > I don't see any problems with finding help or yelp crashing on exit. I > didn't really modify any of the dot files, either. That's good to know. It seems -CURRENT is more "stable" in this case. > The 2.14 links are expected as those documents have not been updated > since then. Sheesh. This is not the fault of the FreeBSD Gnome team, of course. > Without a backtrace with full debugging symbols, I can't do much. Understood, but I have some major milestones due in the next two weeks. I just don't recompile anything when I have tight deadlines, both because of time and risk. Thereafter I can help more. Frank
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1191801759.967.29.camel>