Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:55:27 -0600 (CST) From: RacerX <racerx@makeworld.com> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... Message-ID: <20050217115303.M79020@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <128456842.20050217185105@wanadoo.fr> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641B03@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <dcb2c27a050217030879ce4b5a@mail.gmail.com> <128456842.20050217185105@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Sander Vesik writes: *Snip* >> Installing itself does not destabilize a server as it doesn't imply >> running an X server while teh sever is in production. > > It doesn't need to be run. Just the installation makes destabilizing > changes. > > -- > Anthony > That is a very harsh statement - Now that you have made it; show us the proof that you base your reply on. Show us the urls that says what you said. Show us the white papers that state what you have stated. Show us the real proof of your last statement, if you cant - its just heresay. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050217115303.M79020>