Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 23:38:37 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nvidia-driver vs. mesa-libs Message-ID: <ae6e7482-a31a-746a-9df6-79440561d748@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <13dd7938-1c59-a1bc-2204-437fd546cec1@pinyon.org> References: <16d6fd45-5527-664f-9ce3-0449878243cd@pinyon.org> <6150fc53-ce49-274c-fa12-5ced30ebb363@gwdg.de> <13dd7938-1c59-a1bc-2204-437fd546cec1@pinyon.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 20.09.20 um 21:38 schrieb Russell L. Carter: > On 2020-09-20 12:30, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> Hi Russel, >> >> There is a PR opened already: >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249448 >> >> You could try the patch or wait until x11/nvidia-driver* is updated. >> >> HTH, >> Rainer > > Ok, that's fine.=C2=A0 I can wait quite a bit and pull down > the update when the fix lands. > > I was previously somewhat tempted, occasionally, to automate > the weekly 'pkg upgrade' but in this case that would have been > a big oops. The approach would be to check first what your automated "pkg upgrade" would do (there is a dry-run option, pkg upgrade -n) and then have it balk if any uninstalls would happen, or otherwise proceed. Someone more knowledgable about pkg might know a more efficient way.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ae6e7482-a31a-746a-9df6-79440561d748>