Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:30:14 +0900 From: Joel Rees <rees@ddcom.co.jp> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 release date and stability Message-ID: <F5D52A37-94B5-47FF-A1F5-96A552DAE97E@ddcom.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <1932.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129608301.squirrel@172.16.0.1> References: <200510152346.RAA20742@lariat.net> <6.2.3.4.0.20051017202509.0869bc58@64.7.153.2> <6.2.5.6.2.20051017195314.080f90f8@lariat.org> <6.2.3.4.0.20051017215901.045afa88@64.7.153.2> <6.2.5.6.2.20051017215302.07669a20@lariat.org> <1932.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129608301.squirrel@172.16.0.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On =E5=B9=B3=E6=88=90 17/10/18, at 13:05, Mike Jakubik wrote: > On Mon, October 17, 2005 11:56 pm, Brett Glass wrote: > >>> Features=3D0x178bfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR= =20 >>> ,PG >>> E,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT> >>> Features2=3D0x1<SSE3> >>> AMD Features=3D0xe2500800<SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,FFXSR,LM,3DNow+,3DNow> >>> AMD Features2=3D0x3<LAHF,CMP> >>> Multicore: 2 physical cores >>> >>> >> >> How come the kernel is reporting that an AMD chip has HTT? Is this =20= >> a bug? >> > > No, this is how dual core is reported. Huh? Don't scare me like that, Mike. Joel Rees <rees@ddcom.co.jp> digitcom, inc. =E6=A0=AA=E5=BC=8F=E4=BC=9A=E7=A4=BE=E3=83=87=E3=82=B8=E3= =82=B3=E3=83=A0 Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 ** <http://www.ddcom.co.jp>; **
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F5D52A37-94B5-47FF-A1F5-96A552DAE97E>