Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 10:44:18 +0200 (MSZ) From: me@tartufo.pcs.dec.com (Michael Elbel) To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xemacs port in combination with ispell port Message-ID: <m0sQWFn-000PZoC@tartufo.pcs.dec.com> In-Reply-To: <199506270814.BAA01199@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jun 27, 95 01:14:35 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think it's better to optimize the common cases, i.e., to make things > like ispell work for everyone. But I only have emacs and mule, which > are quite compatible (the latest version of mule follows the latest > version of emacs quite closely) so I might be mis-judging the severity > of the problem. Michael, what do you think? Your points make sense. I'm about to port xemacs-19.12 and will make it look for its site-lisp in /usr/local/share. Since xemacs, like fsfmas seems not to install anything there by default, we should be safe. Now we only need to find all ports that have elisp support and make them put their stuff int /usr/local/share/site-lisp :-) Michael -- Michael Elbel, PCS GmbH, Muenchen, Germany - me@FreeBSD.org Fermentation fault (coors dumped)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0sQWFn-000PZoC>