Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 20:50:28 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@tribe.com> To: kaleb@x.org (Kaleb S. KEITHLEY) Cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Minor change to make Message-ID: <199512030450.UAA04684@bubba.tribe.com> In-Reply-To: <199512022227.WAA14667@exalt.x.org> from "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" at Dec 2, 95 05:27:40 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > N.B. ClearMake, SGI, and Digital, makes all have include directives that > > > silently ignore a failure to find the include file, so this isn't a new > > > > ...as does gmake (which is available as a package), so you could use it > > if you wanted to avoid rebuilding /usr/bin/make... > > Humbug again. > > Since it's 99&44/100ths of the way there already, why should I have to > tell people to go get gmake? Why can't the make that comes with the (next > release of the) system "just do it"? Hey, wait a minute, I agree with you! The FreeBSD make ought to have this feature; in fact, I definately would argue for it as well. I didn't mean to imply that you *should* use gmake, just that you *could*. :-) -Archie _______________________________________________________________________________ Archie L. Cobbs, archie@tribe.com * Tribe Computer Works http://www.tribe.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512030450.UAA04684>