Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Feb 1996 14:36:12 +0500
From:      Richard J Kuhns <rjk@sparcmill.grauel.com>
To:        "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org>
Cc:        Richard J Kuhns <rjk@watson.grauel.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: One problem && one question 
Message-ID:  <9602121936.AA15018@sparcmill.grauel.com>
In-Reply-To: <199602121653.IAA10522@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <199602121442.JAA14442@watson.grauel.com> <199602121653.IAA10522@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Justin T. Gibbs writes:
 > 
 > The problem is that I have the PCI ID fror the Buslogic reversed in
 > sys/pci/bt9xx.c.
 > 
 > Change:
 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_BUSLOGIC_946      0x104B1040ul
 > To:
 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_BUSLOGIC_946      0x1040104Bul
 > 
 > I'll fix this in -current and -stable ASAP.  That's what I get for
 > writing the wrapper and not having one of these cards... :)
 > 

Thanks, Justin.

I just made that change and built a new kernel.  The good news is, the pci
probe found the 946.  The bad news is, the kernel won't boot.  The message
is `bt0: Invalid base address', followed almost immediately by the ``reboot
in 15 seconds'' message.  The only difference between the 2 kernels is the
line above.  Unfortunately, none of the boot messages hung around to be
printed later by dmesg.

Anything else I can do to make your day more enjoyable? :-)
--
Rich Kuhns			rjk@grauel.com
PO Box 6249
100 Sawmill Road
Lafayette, IN  47903
(317)477-6000 x319



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9602121936.AA15018>