Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 16:16:01 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: adam@veda.is Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doc directory Message-ID: <199602270016.QAA13637@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199602211215.MAA03303@veda.is> (adam@veda.is)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I looked in etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist and noticed there is no directory * specified for docfiles, yet there are a number of ports that have extra * documentation in various formats other than info or man. These docfiles * tend to be found scattered among various subdirectories of /usr/local. * * I propose that either /usr/local/doc or /usr/local/share/doc be created * as a suitable location for such files. Which one should it be? I think this is a good idea. I'd like to see share/doc, as /usr/local is already pretty crowded as it is. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602270016.QAA13637>