Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 10:40:29 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: jimd@mistery.mcafee.com (Jim Dennis) Cc: ejs@bfd.com, terry@lambert.org, archie@whistle.com, dwhite@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu, clintm@ICSI.Net, FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ip masquerading Message-ID: <199605211740.KAA01479@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199605210414.VAA07076@mistery.mcafee.com> from "Jim Dennis" at May 20, 96 09:14:29 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Win 95's native TCP/IP configuration dialogs include a field for > "proxy" (much like the configuration dialogs of Netscape and > QVTNet's Telnet and FTP clients). > > I suspect that Win '95 can talk to a SOCKS gateway. If anyone > knows for sure (either way) please speak up. If it is SOCKS > compliant than all one should have to do is fill in the > dialog and any of the Win '95 included applets should work > "out of the box." (well, work as well as they do with a > "real" IP address anyway). Can you please verify this? I hit "right-button, properties" on "network neighborhood", which brought up "Network", a tabbed dialog box. The only relevant tab was "Configuration". There were no settings like you describe under either "Client for Microsoft Networks, Properties" or "TCP/IP, Properties" tabbed dialogs -- the native TCP/IP configuration dialogs. I then went to "Start, Settings, Control Panel". "Network" brings up the properties tabbed dialog box. In "Start, Settings, Control Panel, Internet" (which only appears if you install the "Plus!" pack), the "Advanced" tab describes proxy services. I thought this was for the announced NT proxy server? If this is in fact for socks, this would be seriously important to know. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605211740.KAA01479>