Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 09:36:15 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: dufault@hda.com (Peter Dufault) Cc: proff@suburbia.net, dufault@hda.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: #include file xref philosophy Message-ID: <199701081636.JAA16445@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199701081226.HAA03877@hda.hda.com> from "Peter Dufault" at Jan 8, 97 07:26:28 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> (I hope that the POSIX tests don't do things such as include only > unistd.h and verify that something referencing off_t fails.) I believe they can't. Since off_t (a nice particular example, BTW) is defined to be an atomic type, the type may in fact be literal off_t and remain technically compliant with the standard. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701081636.JAA16445>