Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Feb 1997 11:43:16 -0500
From:      Drew Derbyshire <ahd@kew.com>
To:        Scott Mitchell <scott@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
Cc:        wb2oyc@cyberenet.net, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   ATAPI drives (was Re: misc)
Message-ID:  <33049624.4CA8@kew.com>
References:  <199702141229.MAA18141@crux>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Mitchell wrote:
> Any individual with enough clue to read the
> documentation is aware that FreeBSD support for atapi CDROMs is alpha quality;
> no-one is making any secret of that.  It's not a priority of the developers to
> expend massive effort on supporting evil hardware (which atapi assuredly is).

While any author can set his own priorities, I find it unfortunate to
see
the most popular PC CD-ROM type classed as evil -- I own the original
NEC
double spin external SCSI drive, but I find no advantage to it over the 
numerous internal ATAPI drives, including the NEC 6X and 8X ATAPI drives 
on three NEC Pentiums I've directed the purchase of for my family.  That 
vendors have made the cheaper design affordable and thus a staple for
every 
PC is neither evil nor stupid.

It would be desirable for the FreeBSD authors to further the use of
FreeBSD 
to make the ATAPI drives more usable with production quality drives, but
as
originally noted, it's their choice.
-- 
Internet:       ahd@kew.com             Voice:          617-279-9810

"You say that I'm the boy who can make it all come true
 Well I'm tellin ya that I don't know, I don't know what to do . . ."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33049624.4CA8>