Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 14:57:49 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: michaelh@cet.co.jp, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vxfs (was Re: overclocking) Message-ID: <199706111957.OAA09630@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199706111847.LAA06429@phaeton.artisoft.com> from Terry Lambert at "Jun 11, 97 11:47:57 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> [ ... VXFS ... ] > > > It's not available for *BSD. The reasons cited were ... > > > > 1) It's a large porting task, fs/vnode semantics vary quite a bit > > between Unix implementations. > > Actually, it would not be a difficult port (I worked on the VXFS > code in UnixWare a bit; I'm fairly familiar with it). The most > difficult task would be the Vm/Cache issues, mostly because the > new VM system is poorly documented (good code; bad docs). > I disagree (here is my correction): new VM system is poorly documented (good code; NO docs). :-(. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706111957.OAA09630>