Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Jan 1998 20:36:21 +0100
From:      Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Time to retire fetch?
Message-ID:  <19980105203621.45989@keltia.freenix.fr>
In-Reply-To: <199801051447.IAA11455@unix.tfs.net>; from Jim Bryant on Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 08:47:30AM -0600
References:  <4721.883994636@time.cdrom.com> <199801051447.IAA11455@unix.tfs.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Jim Bryant:
> i find fetch to be more reliable than either ncftp or ftp when it
> comes to retreiving files from wcarchive in recent weeks.  also fetch
> has the ability to resume a terminated transfer.  to give one example,

What you want is ncftp3, currently in beta stages.

<ftp://ftp.ncftp.com/ncftp/3.0BETA/>;

Already in /usr/ports/net/ncftp3 :-)
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #26: Thu Jan  1 20:29:10 CET 1998



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980105203621.45989>