Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 03:59:42 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: tg@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/math/numpy Makefile ports/x11/pythonqt Makefile Message-ID: <199801211159.DAA27952@baloon.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <199801211146.DAA10137@freefall.freebsd.org> (message from Satoshi Asami on Wed, 21 Jan 1998 03:46:45 -0800 (PST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* math/numpy Makefile * x11/pythonqt Makefile * Log: * Mark these ports broken. They are not happy with python upgrades. I don't know how to handle cases like this correctly, but I think in general a mail from the "depended" port maintainer to "depending" port maintainers would be nice. If you can coordinate your efforts and commit your changes all at once, even better. At a minimum, I would like to have the "depended" port upgrade being accompanied by the "depending" ports being marked broken. That way a top-down package building won't die in the middle and I don't have to figure out what's going on myself (which should have been obvious to the committer but not to users, including myself). Now, in this case, all three maintainers are actually one person (or at least they share the same mail address), so I'm just going to assume you just forgot to commit changes to other ports, Thomas. Please mark these ports unbroken when you rectify that. :) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801211159.DAA27952>