Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Feb 1998 11:09:12 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        sef@kithrup.com (Sean Eric Fagan), current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: More breakage in -current as a result of header frobbing.
Message-ID:  <199802211809.LAA20161@mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <199802210342.UAA13837@usr04.primenet.com>
References:  <199802210306.TAA07907@kithrup.com> <199802210342.UAA13837@usr04.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Broken -current builds ]
> The same thing happened at Novell, until we instituted multiple
> reader, single writer locking in a trivial front-end to cvs, and
> started slapping people who didn't build test affected code before
> releasing the writer lock.

The same thing happenned at my work, until we let live llama loose in
the office.  Then, if someone made a bad commit, we publically chastised
them and told them never to do it again, but I think the *real* reason
was because of the llamas, and not the chasting of the people.  I'm sure
the reader/writer locks also were why things worked at Novell, and not
the slapping around.

(ps.  In case you missed, that was sarcasm, playing on the totally
non-sequiter answer Terry gave.)


Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802211809.LAA20161>