Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Aug 1998 18:48:37 -0500
From:      John Prince <johnp@lodgenet.com>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        don@whtech.com (Don O'Neil), freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Weird sendmail/pop problem 
Message-ID:  <199808312348.SAA08131@milo.lodgenet.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 31 Aug 1998 23:27:20 -0000." <199808312327.QAA11677@usr01.primenet.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello all..
How about removing the comment from the following in the sendmail.cf file??
#O MeToo

--John Prince



Terry Lambert writes:
> > Well, To correct my mis-statement, I do realize that SMTP is how the mail i
    s
> > delivered, I was intending to point out that I was using a "standard" POP3
> > type client for recieving, not something like IMAP.... Anyway... I've
> > checked the SMTP (sendmail) logs and the delivery is only made to one of th
    e
> > two recipents, no matter what order the names are in the .forward file, my
> > name is allways skipped.... Now, my name is of course the one sending the
> > message... is there something in sendmail that knows I was the originator
> > and doesn't bother to send the message back to me? Now if I send a message
> > using mail or elm, or pine, or sendmail directly from the box (not using th
    e
> > PC client) then both recipients get the message (I did this a root).
> 
> Sendmail does not know you are the originator.
> 
> The questions that would have been answered for me by the information
> I requested are:
> 
> 1)	What are the "MAIL FROM:" and "RCPT TO:" linces actually
> 	being sent to sendmail?
> 
> 2)	Are any of the addresses aliases for each other?  If so,
> 	sendmail will realize this, and send only a single copy
> 	of the message to any one local maildrop.
> 
> 3)	Are you attempting to use "popclient" or "fetchmail" in
> 	"multidrop mode"?
> 
> 	A)	Fetchmail is broken, in that it searches for
> 		"any header" instead of "best header".
> 
> 	B)	You should use "X-Envelope-To".  If you are
> 		using "qmail", you should use "Delivered-To"
> 		and "-qvirtual" to remove the domain prefix
> 		that qmail stupidly prepends to the "Delivered-To"
> 		name.
> 
> 	C)	If you can not use (A) or (B), then you should
> 		remove the "m" flag in the mailer doing delivery.
> 		This will result in a "Recieved ... by ... for ..."
> 		line, where "by ..." is by your MX, and "for ..."
> 		is for the addressee
> 
> 4)	If you are using the same mail client to donload from
> 	one or mor addresses, make sure you have not told it to
> 	get rid of mail you have "already seen".  This is done
> 	by "Message-ID" in many instances, and will result in
> 	your mail client "hiding" the "duplicate" message.
> 
> Of course, there is a hell of a lot more detail than this, and a
> hell of a lot more branch paths possible, depending on the other
> questions I didn't tell you that the data would answer, and varying
> by the mail clients, etc., that you are using.
> 
> 
> 					Terry Lambert
> 					terry@lambert.org
> ---
> Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
> or previous employers.
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808312348.SAA08131>