Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Dec 1998 02:04:35 +1030 (CST)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au>
To:        =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@freebsd.dk>
Cc:        sos@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa wcd.c src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC LINT         devices.i386 files.i386 majors.i386
Message-ID:  <Pine.OSF.4.05.9812280153480.12067-100000@bragg>
In-Reply-To: <199812271513.QAA12165@freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Søren Schmidt wrote:

> It seems Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >Hrm, how well-tested has this been? I hadn't been using the new driver because
> >of:
> >
> >1.1 Tue Sep 8 20:57:47 1998 UTC by sos 
> 
> What CVS repository do you use, mine says:
> 
> $Id: atapi-cd.c,v 1.6 1998/12/07 21:58:20 archie Exp $

The above was from the cvsweb output. My version of atapi-cd is indeed the
same as yours - I was just quoting your original commit message, which seems
to support my understanding that this was not originally intended as a
replacement. If any announcement of the changeover was made, I didn't see it
(and I usually read mailing lists pretty closely).

All this is just trying to say that many people may not have made the change
to your new driver yet, because they didn't realise it was "the future". There
may be a lot of problems which haven't shown up so far simply because of lack
of testing in varied environments.

> >I don't know how much the code changed before you imported it into the tre,
> >but I was able to panic my machine using the previous snapshot of the code you
> >advertised on -hackers earlier in the year.
> 
> It has bee tested pretty well, and besides its not that different from
> the old one, it just add more functionality.

It still panicked me :) I'll test and see if I can get it to do it again..

> >I wonder whether this isn't opening the door for loads of bug reports after
> >3.0.1-release.
> 
> Well, it wont be the only item in that department :)

Assuredly not, but I don't really see the wisdom in cutting to a new driver
version in the first "stable" 3.0 release, which may have unknown problems
because no-one (if I'm correct in the above) knew it was the driver they
should have been stress-testing :-) I wonder how many other people were still
(like me) using wcd because they didn't know better..

Kris

-----
productivity suite, Office 2000, will be delayed until the first quarter
of 1901.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.05.9812280153480.12067-100000>