Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Apr 1999 15:27:27 -0600
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        "Gregory P. Smith" <greg@nas.nasa.gov>
Cc:        Igor Roshchin <igor@physics.uiuc.edu>, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ssh protocol [was: Interesting problem: chowning files sent via FTP]
Message-ID:  <4.2.0.32.19990412152634.00ce0bb0@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <199904122047.NAA01335@ryouko.nas.nasa.gov>
References:  <Your message of "Mon, 12 Apr 1999 13:28:39 MDT." <4.2.0.32.19990412132649.043b7350@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
A GPLed implementation would be a bad idea, because it would prevent
the code from being incorporated into commercial products and thus
discourage standardization. This is one situation in which BSD-type
licensing would be infinitely preferable.

--Brett

At 01:47 PM 4/12/99 -0700, Gregory P. Smith wrote:

>> As I understand it, SSH is encumbered by a license that requires
>> you to pay big bucks unless you're an individual or a non-profit.
>> I'd need to build the protocol into the specialized client
>> software, too, which also isn't allowed by the license. If it
>> were BSD-licensed, it wouldn't be a problem. 
>
>The ssh PROTOCOL is free.  In fact, the v2 protocol is making progress
>towards becoming an IETF standard.  (v2 fixes some serious bugs in the
>v1 protocol).  There is a free (GNU) ssh v2 protocol implementation in
>the works...  Check out
>
>http://www.net.lut.ac.uk/psst/
>
>(specifically, look at lsh)
>
>-Greg



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.32.19990412152634.00ce0bb0>