Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:14:38 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: eivind@FreeBSD.ORG (Eivind Eklund) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, dev.null@funbox.demon.co.uk, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proposed secure-level 4 patch Message-ID: <199906211414.AAA19019@cheops.anu.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <19990621142104.X63035@bitbox.follo.net> from "Eivind Eklund" at Jun 21, 99 02:21:04 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Eivind Eklund, sie said: > > On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 03:18:34PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote: > > How about a bit vector defining which ports can and can't be bound from > > non-root below 1024 ? > > > > a 256 byte array doesn't sound too bad does it ? > > Why haven't I seen the magic words of 'Merge from OpenBSD' in a commit > related to this yet? ;-) > > (OpenBSD has support for this, and the patches didn't look scarily large) Because nobody who tracks OpenBSD reads this list ? :) By all means, if that's what they do then import their code rather than create a new and incompatible mechanism. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906211414.AAA19019>