Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:39:28 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, jb@freebsd.org, eischen@vigrid.com Subject: Re: pthreads in -stable Message-ID: <9333.930631168@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:22:37 %2B1000." <199906290422.OAA11718@cimlogic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Just take the libc_r from your current system. The internals of the > implementation are (supposed to be) opaque. Should be easy to try > out if the application is dynamically linked. At worst it'll be a > relink if the application is statically linked. Hmmm. The internals may be opaque but you bumped the revision number for *some* reason that involved changing the interface or there'd have been no reason to bump the number, si senor? :-) In any case, the test app they sent me was indeed linked dynamic and so I did attempt to simply copy a new -current libc_r.so.4 to libc_r.so.3 for the app to use, and doing so caused it to die with a signal 11 rather than an infinite loop so I deemed it a probable mismatch and moved on. Whether that judgement was too hasty will, I hope, be proven either way once I get this product building under -current entirely. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9333.930631168>