Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 08:45:06 +0530 From: "Biju Susmer" <bee@wipinfo.soft.net> To: "'Warner Losh'" <imp@village.org>, "'Brian F. Feldman'" <green@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "'Daniel O'Connor'" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, "'Wes Peters'" <wes@softweyr.com>, <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, "'Vince Vielhaber'" <vev@michvhf.com>, "'Chris'" <reman@tig.com.au>, <bee@wipinfo.soft.net> Subject: RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ? Message-ID: <003a01bee215$62f58240$88291fac@wipro.tcpn.com> In-Reply-To: <199908070508.XAA07305@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Odd, all of the machines that I've seen shipped lately have their > CDROMs on a secondary IDE controller as SLAVE with no master. Works > great, and the FreeBSD drivers work well when hacked to not require > a master fo there to be a slave.... i commented out one line in wd.c, wdprobe() and it works fine... The funny thing is it checks for slave, its signature etc if ATAPI is defined and then returns a 0 saying "drive 0 error" !! (In this case du->dk_error is 0x7f) -biju To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003a01bee215$62f58240$88291fac>