Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 11:30:46 +0900 From: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: schuerge@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE Cc: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Subject: Re: AWE64 problems Message-ID: <14413.49878.644230.10865D@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 %2B0100 (MET)" <199912072200.XAA14065@wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de> References: <19991207222414.A555@radio-do.de> <199912072200.XAA14065@wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET), Thomas Schuerger <schuerge@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE> said: >> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999 >> +++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999 >> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ >> if (error) >> return error; >> else >> - return -100; >> + return -1; >> } >> >> static int Thomas> Works fine for me. Thanks!!! Yes, this patch should work. The probe likelyhood(do we call it so?) for unknown device is -100, so it does not make sense for sbc to return -100. -1 might be too high, -50 sounds good to me. -- Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <tanimura@freebsd.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14413.49878.644230.10865D>