Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:48:37 +0000 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Greg V <greg@unrelenting.technology> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>, George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, emaste@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE and 11.2-RELEASE images fail to boot on BeagleBone Black Message-ID: <20190716004836.GC19462@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <1A010154-D48C-43B2-8F7B-71C85D34577C@unrelenting.technology> References: <20190713152404.GJ1503@dendrobates> <b6876ce7-5147-5f1a-d712-3515e124cd36@gmail.com> <6b3dcec02b425a8559605b4e6c5ada19ee642728.camel@freebsd.org> <20190713194256.GK1503@dendrobates> <85e35455-793a-84fe-c8cf-39b89ade7c11@gmail.com> <900bc3467c7e28f58e8e6cf17e881bdefcb3b751.camel@freebsd.org> <20190714174432.GC26897@lonesome.com> <e43cb386-b1db-9cc0-1132-1ae9b2994344@m5p.com> <20190715200456.6d64e3b9297ca0f54ffc0577@bidouilliste.com> <1A010154-D48C-43B2-8F7B-71C85D34577C@unrelenting.technology>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 03:31:06AM +0300, Greg V wrote: > I would expect generic ACPI "SBSA-ish" aarch64 to be promoted to > tier-1 before any of the embedded stuff.. We have kind of waved our hands about "arm" in this discussion. aarch64 in FreeBSD is far more mature: - there are less variations to troubleshoot - building ports natively is much easier - in general, FreeBSD ports work better on 64 than 32-bit Cc:ing emaste@, who has been advocating Tier-2 for arm for a while. (I probably should have brought him into this discussion several days ago.) mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190716004836.GC19462>