Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:55:37 -0500 (EST)
From:      Charles Youse <cyouse@paradox.nexuslabs.com>
To:        "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: PR kern/15656 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.20.0001171153070.15159-100000@paradox.nexuslabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <200001171639.LAA18994@whizzo.transsys.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:

> So, if you implemented as it is described, computing a sum of the
> packet contents who's result is 0x0000 would then be complemented to
> 0xFFFF for inclusion in the packet header.  

Agreed; however, the PR states that should the checksum be 0xFFFF, the
complement of which is 0x0000, the checksum should still be sent as
0xFFFF.

Can anyone verify this?  I can verify that BSD sends 0-checksums; I can't
on Solaris.

Chuck




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.0001171153070.15159-100000>