Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:32:32 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0 a severe disappointment Message-ID: <200003231632.JAA03028@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <200003231631.JAA41493@harmony.village.org> References: <200003231629.JAA02977@nomad.yogotech.com> <200003231618.JAA02894@nomad.yogotech.com> <imp@village.org> <200003230551.WAA37833@harmony.village.org> <200003230830.IAA00509@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <200003231624.JAA41343@harmony.village.org> <200003231631.JAA41493@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : And to add to this, the entire resource allocation scheme in the cards > : can be safely ignored for the most part. Some of the drivers (most > : notably sio) want the card to use the same resources as they expect, but > : those resources are assigned by pccardd/kernel, and can be almost > : anything that doesn't conflict with already existing devices.. > > sio no longer has this restriction. It will use whatever address > pccardd tells it to use. However, most of the entries are setup to be > one of the COMx ports while sio still had this restriction. Kewl D00d! Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003231632.JAA03028>